TL;DR
- Sandeep Nailwal questions the lack of assist from Vitalik Buterin for Polygon PoS, regardless of its contribution to Ethereum’s development.
- Polygon PoS has managed to scale back transaction charges to $0.015 and facilitated the migration of dApps, but it surely has not obtained the anticipated recognition.
- Nailwal criticizes Ethereum’s bias in the direction of summary definitions like decentralization, suggesting that this has overshadowed different sensible options.
Sandeep Nailwal, co-founder of Polygon, has expressed his confusion concerning the lack of assist from Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, for Polygon PoS, a community that has performed an important position within the adoption and development of ETH.
In a message shared on X (previously Twitter), Nailwal questioned why Ethereum, regardless of Polygon’s achievements, has proven resistance to the answer, whereas Buterin has brazenly praised Solana, a competing blockchain.
Polygon’s Contributions to the Ethereum Community
Polygon PoS has managed to scale back transaction charges to a median of $0.015, making it significantly cheaper than Ethereum’s mainnet charges. Moreover, its sidechain mannequin processes transactions effectively, assuaging congestion and decreasing fuel prices on the Ethereum community. This resolution has been essential in attracting 1000’s of builders and initiatives to the ETH ecosystem, because it permits for dApp migration without having to rewrite code, due to compatibility with the Ethereum Digital Machine (EVM).
Regardless of these achievements, Nailwal feels that the Ethereum neighborhood has not adequately acknowledged the worth Polygon has delivered to the ecosystem. The sensation of an absence of assist is much more evident when in comparison with Buterin’s backing of Solana, a blockchain recognized for its give attention to decentralization and pace, but in addition criticized for its complexity.
A Lack of Appreciation for Outcomes
Buterin has “praised” the Solana community for its capability to decentralize and its excessive Nakamoto coefficient, which measures the distribution of validators within the community. Nevertheless, he has additionally identified that its give attention to effectivity may sacrifice decentralization rules.
Sandeep Nailwal mirrored on the state of affairs and steered that Ethereum’s neighborhood bias towards summary definitions, equivalent to decentralization, has led to a lack of recognition for options that really profit customers. Regardless of the resistance to Polygon PoS, Nailwal stays satisfied that this mannequin has made a major contribution to Ethereum’s blockchain and hopes the neighborhood will start to worth tangible outcomes over summary theories
