Monday, April 28, 2025

US judge transfers Binance lawsuit to Florida, citing first-to-file rule

189
SHARES
1.5k
VIEWS
Sign up an get up to $1000 USDT!


A US judge has granted Binance’s movement to switch a case involving allegations it facilitated cash laundering to the Southern District of Florida due to an identical case that had already been earlier than the courts there.

The case, filed in August 2024 in Washington, targeted on the identical core concern as a swimsuit filed in June 2023 in Florida, accusing Binance of permitting cybercriminals to use the platform for money laundering, US District Judge Barbara Rothstein said in an April 21 order. 

“Though the 2 complaints describe the proposed courses in barely completely different phrases, each embody the identical proposed class of people whose cryptocurrency was stolen and transferred to a Binance.com account throughout the related interval,” Judge Rothstein mentioned.

“Due to this fact, this Courtroom concludes that the courses of plaintiffs are sufficiently comparable to warrant utility of the first-to-file rule.”

Cryptocurrency Exchange, Florida, Binance
US District Judge Barbara Rothstein mentioned transferring the Washington lawsuit to Florida was acceptable given the similarity to a case already being heard there. Supply: Law360

The primary-to-file rule permits a court docket to decline a ruling on a matter when a grievance involving the identical events and points has already been filed in one other district. Typically, the court docket that first hears the case often retains jurisdiction, according to authorized useful resource LSD Regulation.

Plaintiffs say the lawsuits differ in key areas 

Attorneys performing for the plaintiffs within the Washington case argued that it differed from the Florida swimsuit as a result of it added different accusations not current within the Florida lawsuit and named former CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao as a defendant. 

In addition they argued that transferring the case might postpone each court docket actions to the “detriment of all plaintiffs.”