Opinion by: Igor Mandrigin, co-founder and CTPO of Gateway.fm
Each couple of weeks, it appears one other layer 2 rolls out, a lot to the chagrin of some Web3 business commentators who’re involved about fragmentation. A latest Gemini Institutional Insights report truly famous how a brand new Ethereum L2 answer is launched roughly each 19 days. In response to the seemingly limitless conveyor belt of latest zkEVMs and optimistic rollups coming to market, the refrain of criticism continues to develop louder: “That is undoubtedly the saturation level, no extra chains are wanted.”
A few of the most outspoken critics of L2s argue that L2s are redundant, however that is slim considering. In many methods, the concept that creating new L2s ought to be slowed down is like arguing that there have been too many web sites in 1998. The proliferation of L2s isn’t inflicting the Web3 house to grow to be overly bloated or fragmented in any respect. The variety of chains at the moment isn’t too many. It’s laughably few, and proper now could be the early innings of a multi-decade explosion in specialised, modular blockchain infrastructure.
The rise of L2s is much from a passing fad
Whereas some contend that this L2 surge we’ve been experiencing is merely a brief frenzy led by DeFi degenerates, it’s actually an enterprise-grade infrastructure growth, as banks (together with Deutsche Bank), sport studios (gaming exercise on some L2 blockchains rose by over 20,000% in February 2025), logistics networks and international producers get on board.
Industries like banking and logistics, that are usually risk-averse, don’t make main tech pivots flippantly. They accomplish that as a result of they must, and in many circumstances, public blockchains don’t meet their wants. Returning to their inherent risk-averse DNA, giant enterprises and establishments in these sectors usually gained’t wish to construct on shared, general-purpose L1s. As an alternative, they’ll wish to deploy their very own chains the place they can take pleasure in customized efficiency, predictable prices, jurisdictional compliance and granular-level privateness.
This give attention to proprietary networks isn’t solely a Web3 factor. Let’s give it some thought. Did Fb, Netflix and JPMorgan co-host on GeoCities? In fact not, so why would Web3 be any totally different? Shared L1s and monolithic architectures might need labored for early token experiments and composable DeFi primitives. Nonetheless, realistically, they can’t help real-world companies’ complexity, regulatory burden or contractual necessities.
The rising viability of L2s
Because of modular stacks, rollup-as-a-service platforms and breakthrough zero-knowledge proof know-how, spinning up a devoted chain is turning into more and more viable and accessible to a variety of enterprises throughout the business spectrum. Because the infrastructure improves, the price of launching and sustaining specialised chains will even scale back, so a considerable rise within the variety of L2s can be anticipated as time goes on.
Latest: Devs introduce Ethereum R1 layer-2 scaling solution
Some onlookers will argue that this future will be convoluted for customers compelled to hop between chains whereas voicing issues about liquidity fragmentation and the dispersal of tradable belongings throughout a number of platforms. These are short-sighted issues. We’re constructing towards seamless interoperability by means of shared settlement layers, trust-minimized bridges and unified account abstraction. In the end, the end-user gained’t care whether or not they’re on rollup #4,318 or chain #9,072; they’ll simply transact with ease and be pleased with that.
In the identical method that cloud computing unlocked hyper scale by abstracting the {hardware} layer, modular blockchains are unlocking hyperscale for worth switch, asset issuance and programmable belief. Regardless of what the doubters say, specialised L2s gained’t cannibalize one another. They’ll serve totally different verticals, jurisdictions and use circumstances. There is not any purpose why an L2 for high-frequency buying and selling can’t simply coexist with an L2 for nationwide land registries.
We’re not drowning in chains — we’re barely ankle-deep within the grand scheme of issues. Anybody severely betting on consolidation or some magical “winner-take-all” chain is simply betting towards scale and sovereignty. The true guess is a whole bunch of L2s and 1000’s of use circumstances as a part of one modular, scalable future.
Opinion by: Igor Mandrigin, co-founder and CTPO of Gateway.fm.
This text is for basic data functions and isn’t meant to be and shouldn’t be taken as authorized or funding recommendation. The views, ideas, and opinions expressed listed here are the creator’s alone and don’t essentially replicate or symbolize the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.
