Will Stablecoins Threaten US Banks?

At this time’s large story:

Can the GENIUS Act save banks from stablecoins? A particular visitor creator explores how stablecoins are a brand new type of cash, with an outdated sort of restrict.

In different information:

Learn extra beneath! However first, please give our sponsors some love; they make this text attainable.

DIA launches $DIA Staking and Oracle Grants with 20 chains, together with Arbitrum, BNB Chain, and Avalanche. Energy your dApp with trustless oracles, cost-free.

DIA’s Infra Gardens Occasion Recap: Constructing the Way forward for Crypto & DeFi

Relive the highlights from the Infra Gardens occasion! 🌿 Trade leaders gathered in a shocking backyard villa to debate the way forward for crypto, DeFi, and blockchain innovation. From thrilling bulletins just like the Robinhood chain to insights on Ethereum’s sustainability and DeFi’s rising impression, this occasion was full of inspiration. Don’t miss the vitality and concepts which can be shaping the following wave of innovation — watch the recap video now!

📈 Markets within the final 24 hrs:

At this time’s Large Story

“No member financial institution shall, instantly or not directly by any gadget in any way, pay any curiosity on any deposit which is payable on demand.”

— Part 11(b) of the Banking Act of 1933

Can the Genius Act Save Banks from Stablecoins?

Cash market funds — the world’s most boring monetary product — terrified bankers as quickly as they began to catch on within the Seventies.

When rates of interest soared past what banks have been legally allowed to pay on deposits, cash market funds, which confronted no such restrictions, abruptly appeared like a risk to the complete banking system.

None aside from Paul Volcker known as cash market funds a “regulatory arbitrage” that “weakens the monetary system” as a result of they “sucked deposits out of banks.”

The issue was that banks couldn’t compete with the upper rates of interest on provide from cash market funds due to Regulation Q — a 1933 rule explicitly designed to forestall banks from competing on curiosity.

Within the Nineteen Twenties, banks engaged in a ruinous “price conflict,” providing ever-higher rates of interest to draw deposits.

To pay these charges, banks needed to make more and more dangerous loans, making a harmful cycle that in the end destabilized the banking system.

Regulation Q sought to avert such competitors by banning banks from paying any curiosity in any respect on checking accounts and capping what they might pay on financial savings accounts and CDs.

That is why banks grew to become well-known for giving out items in return for brand new deposits: They couldn’t provide the next rate of interest than their rivals, so that they provided toaster ovens and televisions as an alternative.

In 1979, for example, depositing $1,475 with the Republic Nationwide Financial institution for 3.5 years earned you a 17-inch colour tv, and the identical quantity deposited for five.5 years earned a 25-inch one.

Need an excellent higher deal? Depositing simply $950 for five.5 years earned you a stereo with built-in disco lights.

However even disco lights weren’t sufficient to maintain financial institution depositors from fleeing to unregulated cash market funds.

Cash market funds have been in a position to pay these greater rates of interest as a result of they didn’t pay “curiosity”: They acquired previous Regulation Q by paying dividends as an alternative.

This was (and stays) a distinction with no distinction, however regulators selected to permit it within the title of economic innovation.

Banks warned that this regulatory arbitrage would siphon away their deposits and impair their capability to make loans.

They have been proper, too: Within the decade or so after cash market funds have been launched, retail savers moved tons of of billions of {dollars} out of their native banks and into the brand new “shadow banking system” of cash markets.

As forewarned, this impaired the regulated banking system’s capability to serve its core objective of making the cash that the US financial system wanted to develop.

To their credit score, regulators acknowledged the issue and, as early as 1970, started providing banks numerous exemptions to Regulation Q.

By 1986, rate of interest caps had been nearly totally phased out; however it wasn’t till after the Nice Monetary Disaster — triggered partially by a panic over unregulated cash market funds — that lawmakers determined to totally repeal Regulation Q.

The bell couldn’t be unrung, nevertheless.

For higher and worse, the choice to permit cash market funds to pay curiosity whereas banks couldn’t shifted the muse of the US monetary system from financial institution loans to capital markets.

Now, the federal government’s resolution to permit stablecoins into the US banking system would possibly do one thing comparable.

The Genius Act, anticipated to be signed into legislation any second now, legalizes stablecoins as a brand new type of cash.

Particularly, stablecoins turn into non-bank cash that appears eerily just like the cash market funds that have been de facto legalized within the Seventies over the objection of the banking trade.

Lawmakers, nevertheless, seem to have lengthy recollections: This time round, the brand new type of cash they’re permitting is not going to be curiosity bearing.

The Genius Act prohibits issuers from paying curiosity on stablecoins, within the hope of defending the banking system from the identical sort of ruinous “price conflict” that Regulation Q was designed to forestall.

Curiosity-bearing stablecoins, it’s feared, might additional drain the banking system of demand deposits, making it even tougher to your pleasant neighborhood group financial institution to provide you a mortgage.

It would occur anyway.

If cash market funds have been in a position to innovate their approach round Regulation Q, is there any doubt that crypto will have the ability to innovate its approach across the Genius Act?

Stablecoin issuers will possible determine an equal of rewarding their customers with toasters as an alternative of curiosity.

And even when they don’t, DeFi protocols will determine ever extra methods to pay curiosity.

You may already recover from 5% yield on stablecoins by taking a sliver of good contract threat with a protocol like Compound.

Tellingly, that may signify much less threat than what financial institution depositors have been initially keen to take with cash market funds — and stablecoin deposits are practically as accessible, too.

Cash market funds demonstrated that US savers have been desperate to settle for somewhat counterparty threat and a slight delay to withdrawals in return for greater yields.

A lot in order that at present, cash market funds are successfully threat free as a result of they’ve turn into too large to fail.

The Genius Act could show to be stablecoins’ first step in the identical route.

— Byron Gilliam

Notice: This essay by Blockworks’ Byron Gilliam was initially printed on The Breakdown publication on July 15. Subscribe to The Breakdown here.

🎬WATCH

Robinhood’s Large Crypto Guess with CEO Vlad Tenev

On the latest episode of The Defiant Podcast, The Defiant founder Cami Russo sat down with Vlad Tenev, co-founder and CEO of Robinhood, in Cannes to discover the agency’s just lately introduced main crypto strikes, together with bringing tokenized U.S. shares to the EU and launching its personal Ethereum L2 with Arbitrum tech.

From tokenized non-public shares to the long-term imaginative and prescient of blockchain adoption, Vlad shares insights on regulation, innovation, and the battle between Robinhood and Coinbase.

Cash is Infrastructure: Unlocking the Way forward for Stablecoins with M0 Founder Luca Prosperi

Watch the total interview on YouTube here. [SPONSORED]

High Information in Web3

Cantor Fitzgerald Nears $4 Billion SPAC with Bitcoin Pioneer Monetary providers large Cantor Fitzgerald is reportedly in superior talks to finish a roughly $4 billion special-purpose acquisition firm take care of Adam Again, one in all Bitcoin’s earliest pioneers, to create a Bitcoin treasury firm, in response to the Monetary Occasions.
DOJ, CFTC End Polymarket Probes as Trump Warms to Crypto Betting Federal investigations by The U.S. Division of Justice and the Commodity Futures Buying and selling Fee into crypto prediction markets agency Polymarket have each been closed, Bloomberg reported. The information comes as Congress makes an attempt to move three main crypto payments throughout “Crypto Week.”
Solana RWA Growth Outpaces Ethereum in 2025 Tokenized real-world asset development on Solana is up over 200% year-to-date at $553.8 million, outpacing development on Ethereum. A lot of the RWA worth on each Ethereum and Solana — over 90% — comes from stablecoins, per RWAxyz knowledge.
Texas, Utah, and Arizona Lead in Blockchain Policy, Report Shows Some U.S. states are transferring quicker than others when it comes to “blockchain innovation,” per a brand new scorecard device from Chainlink and the Blockchain Affiliation. Texas, Arizona, and Utah have been all ranked within the “Trailblazer” class for his or her efforts in crypto coverage and blockchain growth.