The latest Amazon Net Companies (AWS) outage that knocked out main crypto and fintech platforms, together with Coinbase, Robinhood, MetaMask and Venmo, has reignited debate over how decentralized Web3 actually is.
Whereas blockchains continued producing blocks uninterrupted, tens of millions of customers had been unable to entry wallets, exchanges and decentralized applications (DApps) as a result of their interfaces and application programming interfaces (APIs) had been hosted on centralized servers.
“Decentralization has succeeded on the ledger layer however not but on the infrastructure layer,” Jamie Elkaleh, chief advertising and marketing officer at Bitget Pockets, instructed Cointelegraph. “Actual resilience is determined by diversifying past hyperscalers into community-driven and distributed networks.”
Elkaleh added that full decentralization “isn’t but possible at scale” as a result of most groups depend on hyperscalers like AWS, Google Cloud and Azure for compliance, velocity and uptime. The sensible objective, he mentioned, must be “credible multi-home” infrastructure, distributing workloads throughout each cloud and decentralized networks to keep away from single factors of failure.
Elkaleh argued that cloud suppliers supply scalability and safety, however at the price of focus threat. “If one area or supplier goes down, lots of of apps are affected,” he mentioned. Hybrid techniques, mixing cloud with decentralized storage and community-run nodes, are the subsequent logical step.
Associated: Amazon AWS Outage Hits Coinbase Mobile App, Robinhood
Customers had been locked out of working blockchains
Anthurine Xiang, co-founder of EthStorage and QuarkChain, mentioned the outage proved that “even in Web3, many providers nonetheless rely closely on centralized infrastructure.”
She defined that true decentralization requires redesigning each layer, from storage to entry, in order that no single supplier can take techniques offline. “It’s like the home is okay, however the door is jammed,” Xiang mentioned, describing how customers had been locked out of working blockchains.
The outage started on Monday and lasted for roughly 15 hours. The outage induced Coinbase’s app and Base network to crash, stopping customers from logging in or making transactions, whereas Robinhood merchants reported delays and API failures.
The outage additionally affected MetaMask, with customers reporting that they noticed zero balances of their wallets. “Their property had been protected, however the service accountable for retrieving steadiness information had gone offline,” Xiang defined, noting it wasn’t a technical failure of the blockchain itself.
In the meantime, Jawad Ashraf, CEO of Vanar Blockchain, criticized the crypto business for all “working on the identical servers.” He claimed that roughly 70% of Ethereum nodes are hosted by AWS, Google, or Microsoft. “We’re simply paying three completely different landlords as a substitute of 1,” he mentioned.
Constructing absolutely decentralized techniques is feasible, he added, however “most groups received’t do it anytime quickly” as a result of it’s slower and extra advanced than spinning up on AWS.
A wake-up name
Elkaleh mentioned the outage ought to speed up funding in decentralized cloud, storage and compute networks corresponding to Akash, Filecoin, Arweave and others. He known as for Web3 builders to embrace hybrid fashions that blend conventional reliability with distributed redundancy.
“Each main outage is a wake-up name,” he mentioned. “The way forward for Web3 received’t be outlined by how decentralized the tokens are, however by how distributed the infrastructure actually turns into.”
Journal: Back to Ethereum — How Synthetix, Ronin and Celo saw the light
Cointelegraph by Amin Haqshanas AWS Outage Shows Crypto’s Weak Spot: Centralized Dependence cointelegraph.com 2025-10-26 11:53:24
Source link













