OCC Stablecoin Proposal Targets Yield, Sets Stage for CLARITY Act

The US Workplace of the Comptroller of the Forex (OCC) has dropped a 376‑web page proposal to implement the Guiding and Establishing Nationwide Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act that appears to settle the continuing stablecoin yield combat.

The proposal is open to public remark for 60 days from Wednesday’s publication date, and units out detailed guidelines for permitted cost stablecoin issuers beneath the OCC’s jurisdiction.

Supervised entities could be barred from paying any type of curiosity or yield, whether or not in money, tokens or different consideration, “solely in reference to the holding, use, or retention” of a cost stablecoin, in keeping with part 4(a)(11) of the GENIUS Act. 

Thania Charmani, companion at world legislation agency Winston & Strawn, commented on X that the OCC proposed to “resolve the talk on stablecoin yield by means of rulemaking,” probably clearing the way in which for the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY) to “proceed with out that provision.”

How the OCC proposal implements GENIUS on yield

GENIUS, enacted in July 2025, created a federal framework for cost stablecoins and restricted issuance within the US to licensed permitted issuers equivalent to financial institution subsidiaries, new federal stablecoin issuers, and sure giant state‑regulated corporations. 

The OCC’s draft rule interprets that statutory framework into operational constraints, together with tight limits on how GENIUS‑regulated issuers can construction economics round their stablecoins.

The proposal goes a step additional, including a rebuttable presumption that an issuer is violating the ban on paying yield if it has an association to pay yield to an affiliate or “associated third occasion” and that entity then pays yield to holders of the issuer’s cost stablecoin. 

Associated: Ripple CEO confirms White House meeting between crypto, banking reps

Issuers can attempt to rebut the presumption by submitting written supplies to the OCC, however the company stresses the “shut nexus” between issuer funds and finish‑holder yield and frames such buildings as “extremely probably” makes an attempt to evade the statute.

​The proposal additionally attracts two specific carve‑outs. It “just isn’t meant to forestall” retailers from independently providing reductions for utilizing cost stablecoins, and it doesn’t bar an issuer from sharing income from the stablecoin with a non‑affiliate companion in a whitelabel association. 

What the proposal means for CLARITY and Coinbase

If the OCC’s proposed rule is finalized as drafted, it will have direct implications for the separate CLARITY Act debate over stablecoin rewards. 

CLARITY drafts have targeted on whether or not digital asset service suppliers should be allowed to pay yield or rewards on cost stablecoin balances, a degree of rivalry that has already brought on friction from business stakeholders, together with Coinbase.

By utilizing GENIUS implementation to ban yield on the issuer degree, the banking facet of the framework successfully establishes a no‑yield baseline for GENIUS‑compliant cost stablecoins.

For Coinbase and comparable corporations which have argued they need to have the ability to offer yield on stablecoin balances whereas working inside a totally regulated US framework, the message is evident:

Stablecoin yield and GENIUS‑compliant, OCC‑supervised cost stablecoins are being placed on reverse sides of a regulatory line.

Massive Questions: Is China hoarding gold so yuan becomes global reserve instead of USD?