Technique govt chairman Michael Saylor and Blockstream CEO Adam Back have doubled down on their opposition to BIP-110, a proposed short-term fork to restrict non-monetary transactions on the Bitcoin community.
Bitcoin Enchancment Proposal-110 was launched in December 2025 to cease nonfungible token-like Ordinals inscriptions and different arbitrary information from “spamming” the community and to protect Bitcoin’s primary use as a peer-to-peer money system.
Whereas vital of Ordinals exercise, Saylor and Back concern a fork might do more harm than good to the community’s credibility. “There are 110 issues extra harmful to Bitcoin than spam,” Saylor mentioned in a post to X on Saturday, including that BIP-110 might invalidate atypical transactions on the community.
Supply: Michael Saylor
BIP-110 is among the extra notable protocol-level disputes within the Bitcoin improvement neighborhood because the Blocksize Wars between 2015 and 2017, when ecosystem contributors debated whether or not it was price risking a series cut up to lift the block measurement restrict for scalability.
BIP-110 was launched by pseudonymous Bitcoin developer “Dathon Ohm” with the assist of Ocean protocol founder Luke Dashjr.
BIP-110 is a protracted shot from activating
BIP-110 will not be activated until 55% of Bitcoin nodes validating blocks are in assist of the proposal throughout a Bitcoin block “interval.”
Within the final interval, interval quantity 475 between block 955,584 and 957,599, only one% of blocks have been BIP-110-supportive.
The dispute comes at a time when Ordinals exercise is at close to all-time lows, with fewer than 10,000 Ordinals inscribed into the Bitcoin blockchain every day during the last month, down massively from the greater than 400,000 seen throughout its peak in August 2023.
Change in day by day Ordinals inscriptions since December 2022. Supply: Dune Analytics
In the meantime, Back supplied a deeper critique of BIP-110, describing it as a “quest to police different individuals.”
Associated: Bitcoin doesn’t need Ethereum-style yield, says Strategy’s Michael Saylor
He mentioned Bitcoin’s decentralization ought to imply “you may’t impose your views on others,” calling it incompatible with Bitcoin’s cypherpunk ethos of permissionless, censorship-resistant cash.
Dashjr and different BIP-110 proponents have called Ordinals-driven bloat a “severe menace” to the community, prompting the necessity for an imminent repair.
They’ve additionally argued BIP-110 would not cause a series cut up, as many concern, whereas including that the BIP-110 fork imposes a short lived one-year restrict and thus wouldn’t invalidate fee-paying transactions over the long run.
Options: From Bitcoin critics to blockchain believers: The 5 biggest crypto backflips
