Opinion by: Grigore Roșu, founder and chief government officer of Pi Squared
For some, the audacity of questioning the primacy of blockchain in Web3 is borderline heretical. The concept that decentralization and progress might exist with out blockchains appears absurd to those that constructed careers round Bitcoin, Ethereum, and their descendants. Given blockchain’s well-documented scaling limits, nonetheless, there is an argument to be made that Web3 does not really need blockchains to thrive. As a substitute, it requires fee programs and verifiable settlement programs which can be tremendous quick. Blockchains are only one strategy to obtain that, not the one means.
Whereas blockchain solved the double-spending downside, it launched its personal architectural burden: the inflexible fixation on complete ordering, dictating that each transaction should wait its flip in a world queue, processed by way of a monolithic consensus mechanism. Initially, this made sense within the context of funds, the place safety and ease have been paramount. Nonetheless, within the context of Web3, the place complicated functions require pace, flexibility, and scale, this similar mechanism has turn into a constraint. It imposes a sort of serialized tyranny, throttling throughput and locking builders right into a slender lane of design choices.
The plain affect of FastPay
Cell remittance app FastPay proved that double-spending might be prevented in a different way and not using a complete order. This impressed programs like Linera, which use impartial native orderings whereas sustaining international verifiability, proving {that a} completely different, extra scalable future is potential and already underway. FastPay additionally impressed the likes of POD and Sui’s single-owner objects protocol. If FastPay had been invented earlier than Bitcoin, blockchain may by no means have captured the cultural or technical creativeness in the best way that it did.
Current: Beijing to invest in blockchain, integrate into infrastructure
Some will little doubt argue that complete ordering is important for monetary integrity or that with out blockchains, decentralization itself unravels. These issues, nonetheless, mistake a selected implementation of trustlessness for trustlessness itself. What really underpins decentralized programs is the verifiability of a transaction, not the exact order wherein it occurred relative to each different international transaction.
Blockchain’s rising pains are nonetheless on show
Whereas Ethereum’s Dencun improve sought to enhance transaction throughput by way of “blobs,” the core structure stays tied to complete ordering. Even with Solana’s introduction of the Lattice system, the community continues to undergo outages brought on by bugs and extreme load. Moreover, the explosion of L2s is extra a workaround than an answer, offloading transactions from mainnets solely to reintroduce them later in delayed batches, leading to an countless cycle of what is basically congestion administration.
The rise of versatile fee and settlement protocols
Like in legacy tech circles, the “evolve or die” mantra definitely applies to traders and builders anchored to conventional blockchain architectures. Shifting ahead, protocols prioritizing versatile, verifiable fee programs and settlement over inflexible complete ordering will unlock far larger throughput and higher consumer experiences. As decentralized functions evolve and autonomous brokers pushed by AI start interacting with blockchains, the fee of sequencing every thing so as will turn into a aggressive legal responsibility.
There have already been indicators of this tectonic shift happening, with the rising adoption of modular blockchain frameworks like Celestia underscoring a broader recognition that classical blockchains are too rigid. Information availability layers, execution shards and offchain verification mechanisms are all makes an attempt to decouple blockchain’s trusted validation from its limiting sequencing mannequin. Whereas these efforts might not break fully from the previous, they level unmistakably towards a future of extra adaptable infrastructure.
A brand new position for blockchain
This doesn’t suggest blockchain will disappear, but it surely should evolve. Trying forward, its most enduring position could also be as a common verifier, much less a grasp ledger and extra of a decentralized notary inside a broader, extra agile stack. Whereas this is a needed evolution, sadly, it is exhausting to see how that shift will likely be easy, as an excessive amount of capital, ideology and profession danger is tied up within the legacy narrative.
Many enterprise funds, DeFi protocols, and “Ethereum killers” are financially and reputationally invested in holding the blockchain central. However historical past has little mercy for technological incumbents that cling to yesterday’s mannequin. Simply because the web outgrew its early walled gardens, Web3 is poised to maneuver past the rigidity of block-based sequencing. The fruits from the subsequent wave of infrastructure will belong to those that perceive and capitalize on this inflection level.
Opinion by: Grigore Roșu, founder and chief government officer of Pi Squared.
This text is for basic data functions and is not meant to be and will not be taken as authorized or funding recommendation. The views, ideas, and opinions expressed listed below are the writer’s alone and do not essentially mirror or symbolize the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.
