Friday, August 1, 2025

Backwards-Compatible Quantum Fix Found, Not for BTC and ETH

189
SHARES
1.5k
VIEWS
Sign up an get up to $1000 USDT!

Related articles


Sui Analysis has launched a cryptographic framework that would provide safety towards quantum computing threats with out requiring arduous forks, tackle modifications or key updates.

Cryptographer Kostas Chalkias wrote in a Monday X post that the current analysis paper he co-authored with Sui Analysis constitutes “a serious breakthrough in quantum transition of ‘some’ blockchains.” He defined that whereas the brand new method would apply to Sui, Solana, Close to, Cosmos and different networks, it could not apply to Ethereum and Bitcoin.

“So far as I do know, that is the primary backward-compatible quantum-safe improve path for blockchain wallets to keep away from future forks or freezing accounts,” Chalkias mentioned.

Dan Dadybayo, a researcher at Unstoppable Pockets, informed Cointelegraph that this paper “is among the most vital cryptographic breakthroughs we’ve seen lately.” He defined that it permits quantum-safe wallet upgrades with out requiring modifications to addresses, re-signing or a hard fork.

A tough fork is a everlasting change to a blockchain’s protocol that’s not backward-compatible, which means nodes working the previous software program can’t validate blocks created underneath the brand new guidelines.

Onerous forks have the potential to be contentious and end in two separate networks if not totally adopted by community maintainers. Notable examples embrace Bitcoin (BTC) and Bitcoin Money (BCH), in addition to Ether (ETH) and Ethereum Basic (ETC).

IBM Quantum System One in Ehningen, Germany. Supply: Wikimedia

Associated: Quantum computers could bring lost Bitcoin back to life: Here’s how

The looming quantum risk

Whereas Chalkias mentioned he doubts “we’re wherever close to quantum supremacy that may break cryptography quickly,” the risk is acknowledged as actual by many specialists.

As quantum computer systems grow to be more and more able to breaking the cryptography that underpins blockchains, builders are in search of options with rising urgency.

Within the case of Bitcoin, there are additionally more and more heated group discussions. Throughout a mid-April interview with Cointelegraph, early cypherpunk Adam Again, cited by Satoshi Nakamoto within the Bitcoin white paper, recommended that quantum computing stress might reveal whether the blockchain’s pseudonymous creator is alive.

Again defined that quantum computing may make the Bitcoin held by Satoshi Nakamoto weak to being stolen, forcing him to maneuver it to a brand new tackle to keep away from dropping entry to his cash. The Bitcoin group may be compelled to resolve whether or not to freeze addresses which might be weak to a quantum computing assault when these assaults grow to be sensible. Chalkias added:

“As soon as quantum computer systems arrive, tens of millions of wallets, together with Satoshi’s, may very well be drained immediately. In case your public secret’s seen, it’s going to ultimately be cracked.“

Associated: Bitcoin’s quantum countdown has already begun, Naoris CEO says

How this innovation modifications the equation

Most options to the quantum computing risk embrace altering keys to new ones based mostly on post-quantum cryptography and a deep rework of the software program that he community relies on. As a substitute, with the newly recommended answer, it could be potential to carry out quantum-safe pockets upgrades with out altering addresses, re-signing or requiring a tough fork.

The breakthrough focuses on chains that use the Edwards-curve Digital Signature Algorithm, or EdDSA.

Dadybayo mentioned that “that is potential as a result of EdDSA-based [Edwards-curve digital signature algorithm] chains like Sui, Solana and Close to derive personal keys deterministically from a seed which can be utilized in zero-knowledge proofs to authorize a safe transition, even for dormant accounts.” Zero-knowledge proofs permit customers to show that they know the seed from which their keys are derived with out revealing the important thing.

Tomer Ashur, scientific director at cryptography analysis agency 3MI Labs, informed Cointelegraph that this method “permits to cover sure information {that a} quantum adversary would wish for attacking the scheme.” He added:

“Quite than changing EdDSA, what this method does is to fortify the algorithm towards quantum assaults. ”

The chain can settle for this zero-knowledge proof as an authorization to just accept a post-quantum public key because the community’s new key. This might keep away from the necessity for new account IDs (the previous EdDSA public key would nonetheless be used), re-signing of previous transactions or a tough fork.

Most significantly, dormant accounts are coated. In different phrases, if Bitcoin used EdDSA signatures from its inception, there can be no heated discussions round whether or not Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin can be frozen sooner or later.

Robert Roose, founding father of Cardano interoperability protocol Mynth, admitted that — if the paper is right — this can be a main improvement. “Caveat on the if,” he added.

Journal: Bitcoin vs. the quantum computer threat: Timeline and solutions (2025–2035)