Former U.Okay. Prime Minister Boris Johnson has referred to as bitcoin a “large Ponzi scheme,” prompting a swift rebuttal from Technique chairman Michael Saylor and different netizens.
In a column published within the Every day Mail and posted on social media platform X, Johnson wrote that he had lengthy suspected cryptocurrencies relied on “a provide of latest and credulous buyers” somewhat than actual worth. He pointed to a story from his village in Oxfordshire about a retired man who handed £500 ($661) to somebody in a pub who promised to double the cash by bitcoin.
In line with Johnson’s account, the person spent three and a half years paying charges and making an attempt to withdraw funds. He finally misplaced about £20,000 ($ 26,450), referring to what he admitted was “some type of rip-off.”
Johnson argued that belongings similar to gold and even collectibles like Pokémon playing cards maintain some cultural or bodily enchantment. Bitcoin, he wrote, is “simply a string of numbers saved in a sequence of computer systems.”
He additionally questioned why folks ought to belief a system created by a pseudonymous entity, Satoshi Nakamoto, with out institutional backing.
“Who can we speak to in the event that they decrypt the crypto?” Johnson requested. “There’s nobody besides this Nakamoto, who could also be no extra actual than Pikachu or Charmander themselves.”
Neighborhood push again
Reacting to the column, the cryptocurrency group pushed again towards Johnson’s claims.
Saylor, Government Chairman of the world’s largest company bitcoin holder Technique (MSTR), refuted the claims, saying a Ponzi scheme requires a “central operator promising returns and paying early buyers with funds from later ones.”
Bitcoin, Saylor added, has “no issuer, no promoter, and no assured return—simply an open, decentralized financial community pushed by code and market demand.”
Bitcoin just isn’t a Ponzi scheme. A Ponzi requires a central operator promising returns and paying early buyers with funds from later ones. Bitcoin has no issuer, no promoter, and no assured return—simply an open, decentralized financial community pushed by code and market demand.
— Michael Saylor (@saylor) March 13, 2026
On X, within the “group notes program,” a word was added stating that Ponzi schemes promise artificially excessive charges of returns with subsequent to no danger.
“Bitcoin has no issuer and its worth is solely decided by the free market. The code is completely public and opt-in. No person can pressure you to run any specific model,” the word reads.
Different responses ranged from technical explanations of Bitcoin’s design to broader criticism of presidency financial coverage.
Different responses ranged from technical explanations of Bitcoin’s design to broader criticism of presidency financial coverage. Some customers pointed to Bitcoin’s mounted provide and decentralized community as proof that it differs from traditional Ponzi buildings
Others took a extra combative tone, posting memes and criticizing central banks for increasing the cash provide in the course of the pandemic. As for who’s in cost, BitMEX Analysis replied, “no person is in cost.”
