Binance seeks protective order against SEC’s ‘fishing expedition’

Binance has requested a court docket for a protective order against america Securities and Change Fee, accusing the regulator of enterprise a “fishing expedition” with its discovery requests.

In an Aug. 14 court docket filing, Binance argued whereas it’s labored in good religion with a June court docket order, the SEC has served overly broad and unreasonable discovery requests that search “each single doc in [Binance’s] possession associated to buyer property.”

“BAM has labored in good religion, however the SEC has been steadfast in its perception that the Consent Order provides it carte blanche to research each facet of BAM’s asset custody practices with none discernible limitation in any respect,” it acknowledged.

The June order allowed for the discovery of Binance’s custody, safety and availability of buyer property.  

Binance is searching for a protective order against the SEC, claiming that they’re conducting a “fishing expedition”.https://t.co/NquMV8ShNK

— Molly White (@molly0xFFF) August 15, 2023

Nevertheless, Binance says the requests had been inappropriate as its asset custody practices weren’t of concern within the SEC’s go well with, including it handed over details about buyer property and the SEC hasn’t given proof that buyer property have been misused.

It added the SEC is demanding it produce all communications courting again to November 2022 for “dozens of subjects — a lot of which don’t have anything to do with buyer property.”

It additionally took situation with the SEC’s request that the change makes six of its staff and officers accessible for depositions, together with CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao.

Binance fights again! It recordsdata a movement for protective order against the SEC, accusing it of a ‘fishing expedition.’ The change argues that the regulator’s deposition and discovery requests transcend the scope of the lawsuit filed. #Binance #SEC #cryptonews

— Block Savvy (@Block_Savvy) August 15, 2023

The change claimed its senior executives “do not need distinctive firsthand data concerning the details surrounding the safety, custody, and switch of buyer property.”

Binance additionally mentioned it provided the depositions of senior staff with direct accountability over buyer funds, which the SEC seemingly didn’t take.

The protective order sought by Binance would restrict the SEC to deposing 4 change staff — not together with Zhao or its chief monetary officer. It will additionally cease the SEC from questioning these deposed about issues exterior of the order and halt requests for communications about different subjects in addition to buyer property.

Associated: Senator Lummis files amicus brief supporting Coinbase’s dismissal motion against SEC

The SEC sued Binance and Binance.US in June alleging it operated an unregistered securities change and bought unregistered securities. Zhao was additionally named as a “controlling particular person” within the criticism.

Binance additionally faces a go well with from the Commodity Futures Buying and selling Fee, which the change is seeking to dismiss.

Replace (Aug. 15, 5:56 am UTC): This text has been up to date so as to add extra particulars from the movement for a protective order.

Journal: Crypto regulation — Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the final say?