Sunday, March 30, 2025

Bitget CEO slams Hyperliquid’s handling of “suspicious” incident involving JELLY token

189
SHARES
1.5k
VIEWS
Sign up an get up to $1000 USDT!

Related articles


Gracy Chen, CEO of cryptocurrency change Bitget, criticized Hyperliquid’s handling of a March 26 incident on its perpetual change, saying it put the community in danger of turning into “FTX 2.0.”

On March 26, Hyperliquid, a blockchain community specializing in buying and selling, mentioned it delisted perpetual futures contracts for the JELLY token and would reimburse customers after figuring out “proof of suspicious market exercise” tied to the devices. 

The choice, which was reached by consensus amongst Hyperliquid’s comparatively small quantity of validators, flagged current issues in regards to the common community’s perceived centralization.

“Regardless of presenting itself as an revolutionary decentralized change with a daring imaginative and prescient, Hyperliquid operates extra like an offshore [centralized exchange],” Chen mentioned, after saying “Hyperliquid could also be on observe to turn out to be FTX 2.0.”

FTX was a cryptocurrency change run by Sam Bankman-Fried, who was convicted of fraud within the US after FTX’s abrupt collapse in 2022. 

Chen didn’t accuse Hyperliquid of particular authorized infractions, as a substitute emphasizing what she thought of to be Hyperliquid’s “immature, unethical, and unprofessional” response to the occasion.

“The choice to shut the $JELLY market and pressure settlement of positions at a good worth units a harmful precedent,” Chen mentioned. “Belief—not capital—is the muse of any change […] and as soon as misplaced, it’s virtually not possible to get well.”

Supply: Gracy Chen

Associated: Hyperliquid delists JELLY perps, citing ‘suspicious’ activity

JELLY incident

The JELLY token was launched in January by Venmo co-founder Iqram Magdon-Ismail as half of a Web3 social media mission dubbed JellyJelly. 

It initially reached a market capitalization of roughly $250 million earlier than falling to the only digit hundreds of thousands within the ensuing weeks, according to DexScreener. 

On March 26, JELLY’s market cap soared to round $25 million after Binance, the world’s hottest crypto change, launched its personal perpetual futures tied to the token. 

The identical day, a Hyperliquid dealer “opened a large $6M quick place on JellyJelly” after which “intentionally self-liquidated by pumping JellyJelly’s worth on-chain,” Abhi, founder of Web3 firm AP Collective, said in an X publish.

BitMEX founder Arthur Hayes mentioned preliminary reactions to Hyperliquid’s JELLY incident overestimated the community’s potential reputational dangers.

“Let’s cease pretending hyperliquid is decentralised. After which cease pretending merchants really [care],” Hayes said in an X publish. “Wager you $HYPE is again the place [it] began in brief order trigger degens gonna degen.”

Binance launched JELLY perps on March 26. Supply: Binance

Rising pains

On March 12, Hyperliquid grappled with an analogous disaster attributable to a whale who deliberately liquidated a roughly $200 million lengthy Ether (ETH) place. 

The commerce value depositors into Hyperliquid’s liquidity pool, HLP, roughly $4 million in losses after forcing the pool to unwind the commerce at unfavorable costs. Since then, Hyperliquid has increased collateral requirements for open positions to “scale back the systemic influence of massive positions with hypothetical market influence upon closing.” 

Hyperliquid operates the most well-liked leveraged perpetuals buying and selling platform, controlling roughly 70% of market share, in accordance with a January report by asset supervisor VanEck. 

Perpetual futures, or “perps,” are leveraged futures contracts with no expiry date. Merchants deposit margin collateral, comparable to USDC, to safe open positions.

According to L2Beat, Hyperliquid has two most important validator units, every comprising 4 validators. By comparability, rival chains comparable to Solana and Ethereum are supported by roughly 1,000 and 1 million validators, respectively. 

Extra validators typically reduce the chance of a small group of insiders manipulating a blockchain. 

Journal: What are native rollups? Full guide to Ethereum’s latest innovation