This is an version of The Atlantic Each day, a e-newsletter that guides you thru the most important tales of the day, helps you uncover new concepts, and recommends one of the best in tradition. Sign up for it here.
In the course of the summer time of his 2024 presidential marketing campaign, Donald Trump made a vow to the cryptocurrency {industry}: Elect him, and america would grow to be the “crypto capital of the planet.” That winter, after crypto-industry donations helped safe Trump’s place within the White Home, digital belongings started appreciating quickly—and the president-elect was glad to take the credit score. When bitcoin crossed the $100,000 mark, he merely posted, “YOU’RE WELCOME!!!”
For a way of simply how a lot cash has evaporated from the crypto {industry} since then, look to bitcoin. On October 6, the worth of a single bitcoin climbed to an all-time excessive north of $126,000; at present, its worth is nearer to $69,000. The worldwide market capitalization of all cash has shed greater than $2 trillion in that point, and fewer and fewer traders are dabbling in meme cash and derivatives. Following a comparatively fruitful 2025, crypto-venture-capital offers have fallen off a cliff over the previous few months. Commentators have now began to wonder if the president, who has spent the previous two years positioning himself because the {industry}’s protector and hype man, would possibly provoke a crypto bailout.
However wasn’t Trump’s election already a type of bailout? His specific promise on the marketing campaign path was that America would prepared the ground, however his implicit promise was that costs would go up. Since taking workplace, Trump has established himself because the face of crypto by way of his flagrant promotional tactics (bear in mind these limited-edition bitcoin-orange sneakers?), his sweeping deregulation efforts, and, in fact, his household’s investments in digital belongings. The Trumps have now made lots of of tens of millions of {dollars} from cryptocurrencies, based on latest estimates. Regardless of these hyperlinks, crypto’s destiny isn’t solely tied to the Trumps. There’s no single trigger for the present downturn, nevertheless it demonstrates {that a} president’s intervention—even intervention as constant as Trump’s—can solely accomplish that a lot to maintain cryptocurrencies afloat.
All through its 17 years, bitcoin has been outlined by cycles—booms and busts which can be generally explicable and generally not. This volatility is a part of why the president himself as soon as thought of bitcoin as a “rip-off.” It’s pushed each by an inbuilt technical function referred to as “halving” (which I’ll cease myself from explaining however is worth digging into in case you’re so inclined) and by the pure waxing and waning of world consideration. The 12 months 2021 gave us a historic bubble, fueled partially by venture-capital funding and NFTs. The bubble popped in 2022 because of the unraveling of two crypto kingpins, Do Kwon and Sam Bankman-Fried, and the following regulatory crackdown. After that got here a deep freeze of funding exercise, a so-called crypto winter, and a sluggish however regular restoration. Trump’s 2024 “crypto capital” comment arrived because the sector was beginning to wake from hibernation. Morale was, if not fairly as little as it’s proper now, nowhere close to the place it had been just a few years prior. The crypto optimism of Trump’s election most likely helped increase costs, nevertheless it was not a assured buffer in opposition to all future instability.
The president’s public help of the {industry} is inextricable from his household’s private investments. The Trumps’ empire encompasses the crypto corporations World Liberty Monetary and American Bitcoin, in addition to the crypto-adjacent Trump Media & Know-how Group, which at one level held about $2 billion price of bitcoin. There are additionally the meme cash $TRUMP and $MELANIA, the primary of which made the president a crypto billionaire simply earlier than his inauguration and has since misplaced about 95 p.c of its worth.
The administration has additionally made life simpler for crypto extra broadly, championing industry-backed rules such because the GENIUS Act, a brand new framework for stablecoins that was signed into legislation this previous summer time. It has additionally, individually, dropped Joe Biden–period investigations into main corporations. The White Home is now full of crypto devotees, together with the enterprise capitalist David Sacks, who now serves as particular adviser for AI and crypto, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who has dubbed Trump the “crypto president.” Collectively, this staff has labored to ascertain a crypto-forward White Home, most notably by making a “strategic bitcoin reserve.”
These strikes most likely accelerated the true good points that crypto was making all through the vast majority of 2025. However these good points weren’t completely attributable to Trump, both. Over the previous few years, cryptocurrencies have cropped up in BlackRock’s exchange-traded funds and in mainstream brokerage apps. A aspect impact of crypto’s integration with present monetary establishments is that bitcoin has began to commerce like an unusual tech inventory: Bitcoin’s rise final 12 months coincided with the broader momentum of the tech {industry}. The truth that it’s now crashing doesn’t essentially recommend a whole decoupling (elements of tech, notably software program shares, are getting crushed proper now), however the downtrend is a reminder that crypto is ruled by extra than simply Silicon Valley earnings calls. Plus, the {industry} continues to be extra worldwide than Trump might like it to be; costs are decided by merchants all around the world.
A crypto-friendly White Home was by no means going to be a panacea, however the scale of the latest crash is outstanding. The worldwide crypto market capitalization—that’s, the approximate worth of all of its tokens—has completely erased the good points it made since Trump’s inauguration, regardless of this supposed regulatory golden age. If Democrats return to energy in 2028, they aren’t prone to share this administration’s permissive angle. And people commentators musing about whether or not Trump would bail out crypto are prone to be disenchanted. When requested in a congressional listening to final week whether or not the administration would direct personal banks to buy extra bitcoin, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent insisted that the federal government has no authority to take action.
Bitcoin was as soon as envisioned as a substitute for a corrupt system—one thing completely impartial from governments and massive banks. In 2026, probably the most highly effective politicians and financiers on the planet have gone all-in. An asset that was as soon as anti-system has now successfully grow to be the system. There’s no query that this has benefited crypto in some methods. (For one, institutional adoption has made it extra resilient; crypto is just not past restoration, and it’ll most likely bounce again.) However as a result of nobody actor has unilateral management over the sector’s future, the costs of those cash stay as fickle as ever.
Trump has lengthy embraced the notion that he has the ability to unravel even probably the most intractable issues. He famously instructed voters in 2016 that the system is damaged and that “I alone can fix it.” However volatility is inherent to crypto; not even the “crypto president” can repair that.
Associated:
Listed below are 4 new tales from The Atlantic:
Immediately’s Information
- Prime Trump-administration immigration officers testified before the House Homeland Security Committee in a listening to following the deadly shootings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti by immigration brokers in Minneapolis.
- Newly launched paperwork present that President Trump told Palm Beach, Florida, police in the mid-2000s, shortly after the Jeffrey Epstein investigation turned public, that “everybody has identified” about Epstein’s actions.
- An immigration decide dominated that the Trump administration has no legal basis to deport Rümeysa Öztürk, a Turkish graduate scholar at Tufts College who was detained final 12 months after co-authoring a pro-Palestinian op-ed within the campus newspaper. The decide terminated additional removing proceedings in opposition to her, although the federal government might enchantment.
Night Learn
The Poet Laureate of Insanity
By James Parker
The appointment of a brand new medication man is a dicey second within the lifetime of a tribe. Get it flawed, decide the flawed man, and your deepest non secular illnesses will go not solely untreated however undetected. Get it proper, and there’s at the very least an opportunity of an correct analysis. The Victorians, somewhat surprisingly, bought it proper. Actually, for all their pomposity and stolidity and leadenness of soul, and for all their windbag religiosity, they nailed it. They selected as their nationwide poet a vagrant and depressed semi-atheist from a household of lunatics. They selected Alfred, Lord Tennyson.
Tennyson was already well-known, largely on the power of his blockbuster elegy, In Memoriam, when Queen Victoria made him her poet laureate in 1850. However it’s with the haunted and chaotic pre-fame poet—the shaggy, craggy, germinal genius wandering in his cloud of tobacco smoke and melancholy, poring over his books about physics and chemistry—that Richard Holmes’s The Boundless Deep is mainly involved. Subtitled Younger Tennyson, Science, and the Disaster of Perception, it tracks this character’s metabolic absorption of probably the most disturbing, displacing concepts that up to date science needed to supply; their impact on his character; and their manifestation in his poetry.
Extra From The Atlantic
Tradition Break
Watch. A brand new adaptation of Emily Brontë’s novel, Wuthering Heights, captures the story’s grotesque beauty, David Sims writes.
Learn. If anybody might write good fiction about America’s immigration debate, it might most likely be Lionel Shriver—as a substitute, her newest novel goes off the rails, Adelle Waldman argues.
Explore all of our newsletters here.
Rafaela Jinich contributed to this article.
Whenever you purchase a e book utilizing a hyperlink on this e-newsletter, we obtain a fee. Thanks for supporting The Atlantic.
